The Global Perspective

When we think of revolution, our minds often conjure images of upheaval and violence. From the guillotines of the French Revolution to the storming of the Winter Palace, history, as taught in our school years, has conditioned us to see these seismic political shifts as fundamentally violent events. The bloodshed, the battles, the chaos—these are the images that stick. But is violence the essential trait of a revolution? Or is it merely a symptom? I would argue that the driving force behind any true revolution is not violence, but something far more profound: the complete replacement of one system of governance with a new mindset, a new vision for how a political system should operate. The violence is often a tragic corollary to this radical change, not its engine. Consider the great revolutions that shaped the modern world. The Glorious Revolution in 17th-century England was a monumental shift. It challenged and ultimately replaced a system that had endured for over a millennium, wher...

Politics in Europe: Is the Traditional Left-Right Divide Crumbling? For decades, European politics has been defined by a familiar tug-of-war: the left versus the right. Socialist and progressive parties squared off against conservative and centrist forces, with the occasional liberal party (in the European sense) spicing things up. This comfortable dichotomy, a bedrock of the political landscape, is now facing an unprecedented challenge: the rise of insurrectionist, populist parties that are shaking the foundations of European democracy. The Old Model: A Tale of Two Sides (and Some Variations) Think back to the classic political battles across the continent. In many European nations, a dominant socialist or progressive party would typically face off against a major conservative party. Sometimes, this played out with multiple left-leaning parties against a constellation of centrist and conservative forces, but the basic framework remained. You had your progressives, your conservatives, ...

The 2024 U.S. election delivered a decisive victory for Donald Trump and the Republican Party, giving them control over the presidency, Congress, and the Senate. In retrospect, the reasons for this outcome seem clear. While the Democratic Party may feel dismayed, these results offer valuable lessons for future campaigns. Below, I explore the three major factors which I see as contributing to the Democrats' defeat and the Republicans’ success, and attempt to derive some lessons from the election results. 1. The Economy: A Disconnect Between Data and Perception Economic performance is often the cornerstone of electoral success, and in 2024, the perception of the U.S. economy overshadowed actual metrics. While economic indicators pointed to a thriving economy, public sentiment told a different story. As pointed out by Tim Hartford in the Financial Times (paywall), while headline data might suggest optimism, the positive results might not always be reflected in the daily lives of work...

Part two of a series of articles on deterrence and geopolitical power games This article looks at the question whether deterrence operates the same way in democratic regimes, authoritarian regimes structured around institutional setting, or regimes subject to one-man rule, such as Putin's Russia. Deterrence theory traditionally assumes that states will act rationally to avoid costs, especially when those costs threaten the state's survival or the regime's stability. However, the type of regime significantly influences how deterrence is perceived and how it must be applied. The Risk Profile of Different Regimes In democratic regimes, decision-making tends to be more collective, with various checks and balances that moderate the actions of the state. Leaders in democracies are accountable to their electorate, the media, and other institutional forces, which generally leads to more cautious and calculated decision-making. Deterrence in democratic contexts tends to be more pred...